Cited by 506Soil Management and Crop YieldSustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisSoil Science and Environmental Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DESIGNING A SOIL QUALITY ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR SUSTAINABLE AGROECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT

Andrews, Susan S., Carroll, C. Ronald·2001·Ecological Applications

Abstract

Sustainable agroecosystem management generally entails increased management ability and input. Decision making for sustainable management could be enhanced by tools that provide integration and synthesis of soil test results, management priorities, and environmental concerns. Science-based soil quality indices (SQIs) may provide an ecologically based approach needed for land managers to make sustainable decisions. We developed a general approach for choosing the most representative indicators from large existing data sets, combining indicators into location-specific indices of soil quality, and using this index to assess agricultural management practices. We used a poultry-litter management case study to illustrate the design and use of this SQI. Site-specific indices were created using the SQI design framework for two sites with different soil types but similar climatic regimes. At each site we compared alternative poultry-litter management practices: land application of fresh vs. composted poultry litter. The data sets were composed of >40 assays including total organic C, macro- and micronutrients, heavy metals, plant available water, water-stable aggregate, bulk density, and microbial biomass and activity. Multivariate statistical techniques were used to determine the smallest set of chemical, physical, and biological indicators that account for at least 85% of the variability in the total data set at each site. We defined this set as the minimum data set (MDS) for evaluating soil quality. We evaluated the efficacy of the chosen MDS to assess sustainable management by performing multiple regressions of each MDS against numerical estimates of environmental and agricultural management sustainability goals (i.e., net revenues, P runoff potential, metal contamination, and amount of litter disposed of). Coefficients of determination for these regressions ranged from 0.35 to 0.91, with an average R2 = 0.71. We then transformed and combined each MDS into an additive SQI. Index values exhibited significant differences between management treatments. SQI values for composted litter applied at a low rate were consistently highly ranked, but the relative ranking of treatments changed slightly due to differences in inherent soil properties at the two sites. Using this generalized framework allowed indices to be tailored to local conditions. The resulting soil quality index appears to be an effective monitor of sustainable management.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1573:dasqat]2.0.co;2

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 506

Metadata

Authors
Andrews, S. S., & Carroll, C. R.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Andrews, Susan S.
Venue
Ecological Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-12
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
1573-1585
ISSN
1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2178115242
Cited by
506
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecological Applications (publishedVersion)
Funders
Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Science and Environmental Management
Keywords
soil quality index, soil quality assessment, poultry litter management, Minimum Data Set, indicator selection, phosphorus runoff, heavy metal contamination, soil organic carbon, microbial biomass, water-stable aggregates, land application of manure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DESIGNING A SOIL QUALITY ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR SUSTAINABLE AGROECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011%5B1573:dasqat%5D2.0.co;2
The paper
Andrews, S. S., & Carroll, C. R. (2001). DESIGNING A SOIL QUALITY ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR SUSTAINABLE AGROECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011%5B1573%3Adasqat%5D2.0.co%3B2