The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DESIGNING A SOIL QUALITY ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR SUSTAINABLE AGROECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT
Abstract
Sustainable agroecosystem management generally entails increased management ability and input. Decision making for sustainable management could be enhanced by tools that provide integration and synthesis of soil test results, management priorities, and environmental concerns. Science-based soil quality indices (SQIs) may provide an ecologically based approach needed for land managers to make sustainable decisions. We developed a general approach for choosing the most representative indicators from large existing data sets, combining indicators into location-specific indices of soil quality, and using this index to assess agricultural management practices. We used a poultry-litter management case study to illustrate the design and use of this SQI. Site-specific indices were created using the SQI design framework for two sites with different soil types but similar climatic regimes. At each site we compared alternative poultry-litter management practices: land application of fresh vs. composted poultry litter. The data sets were composed of >40 assays including total organic C, macro- and micronutrients, heavy metals, plant available water, water-stable aggregate, bulk density, and microbial biomass and activity. Multivariate statistical techniques were used to determine the smallest set of chemical, physical, and biological indicators that account for at least 85% of the variability in the total data set at each site. We defined this set as the minimum data set (MDS) for evaluating soil quality. We evaluated the efficacy of the chosen MDS to assess sustainable management by performing multiple regressions of each MDS against numerical estimates of environmental and agricultural management sustainability goals (i.e., net revenues, P runoff potential, metal contamination, and amount of litter disposed of). Coefficients of determination for these regressions ranged from 0.35 to 0.91, with an average R2 = 0.71. We then transformed and combined each MDS into an additive SQI. Index values exhibited significant differences between management treatments. SQI values for composted litter applied at a low rate were consistently highly ranked, but the relative ranking of treatments changed slightly due to differences in inherent soil properties at the two sites. Using this generalized framework allowed indices to be tailored to local conditions. The resulting soil quality index appears to be an effective monitor of sustainable management.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) developed at the Soil Quality Institute (Andrews and Carroll, 2001; Andrews et al., 2004; Karlen et al., 2001; Wienhold et al., 2004, 2009) is rather unique in its fl exibility in the selection of indicators.”
From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Andrews and Carroll, 2001
In the citing paper
“Subsequently, statistical data reduction by multivariate techniques such as principal component analysis (PCA), redundancy analysis (RDA) and discriminant analysis (e.g. Andrews and Carroll, 2001; Lima et al., 2013; Schipper and Sparling, 2000; Shukla et al., 2006), and multiple regression (Kosmas et al., 2014) became more common.”
From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Andrews and Carroll, 2001
In the citing paper
“After this initial data reduction, simple or multiple correlation analysis can further decrease the number of indicators (Andrews and Carroll, 2001; Kosmas et al., 2014), sometimes followed by the use of expert judgement for choosing only one out of two or more highly correlated soil properties (Sparling and Schipper, 2002).”
From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Andrews and Carroll, 2001
In the citing paper
“The non-correlated parameters under a particular PC were considered important and retained in the MDS [10], [12].”
From Comparison of Soil Quality Index Using Three Methods (2014) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter
Nelson, D. W., & Sommers, L. E. (1996) · Soil Science Society of America book series · doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c34 · Cited by 13,048
Cressie, N. (1992) · Terra Nova · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.1992.tb00605.x · Cited by 9,139
Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs.
Tsoukias, A., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1994) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2584151 · Cited by 8,414
5. Statistics for Spatial Data
Rees, M., & Cressie, N. (1993) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.2307/2982871 · Cited by 4,983
Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity
Tabatabai, M. A., & Bremner, J. M. (1969) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(69)90012-1 · Cited by 4,492
Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources.
Rutherford, A. A., & Walters, C. (1987) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531565 · Cited by 3,334
Dunteman, G. H. (1989) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412985475 · Cited by 2,713
Thomas, G. W. (1996) · Soil Science Society of America book series · doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c16 · Cited by 2,707
Assessment of Biotic Integrity Using Fish Communities
Karr, J. R. (1981) · Fisheries · doi:10.1577/1548-8446(1981)006 · Cited by 2,702
Water Retention: Laboratory Methods
Klute, A. (1986) · Soil Science Society of America book series · doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c26 · Cited by 2,361
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Soil quality – A critical review
Bünemann, E. K., Bongiorno, G., Bai, Z., Creamer, R. E., De Deyn, G., de Goede, R., Fleskens, L., Geissen, V., Kuyper, T. W., Mäder, P., et al. (2018) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030 · Cited by 2,960
Restoring Soil Quality to Mitigate Soil Degradation
Lal, R. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su7055875 · Cited by 2,109
The Soil Management Assessment Framework: A Quantitative Soil Quality Evaluation Method
Andrews, S. S., Karlen, D. L., & Cambardella, C. A. (2004) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.1945 · Cited by 1,341
Self-citationAndrews, S. S., Karlen, D. L., & Mitchell, J. P. (2002) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(01)00174-8 · Cited by 1,277
Self-citationPast, present and future of soil quality indices: a biological perspective
Bastida, F., Zsolnay, A., Hernández, T., & García, C. (2008) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.08.007 · Cited by 730
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrews, S. S., & Carroll, C. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Georgia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Andrews, Susan S.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1573-1585
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2178115242
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 8.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecological Applications (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Science and Environmental Management
- Keywords
- soil quality index, soil quality assessment, poultry litter management, Minimum Data Set, indicator selection, phosphorus runoff, heavy metal contamination, soil organic carbon, microbial biomass, water-stable aggregates, land application of manure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DESIGNING A SOIL QUALITY ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR SUSTAINABLE AGROECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011%5B1573:dasqat%5D2.0.co;2
- The paper
- Andrews, S. S., & Carroll, C. R. (2001). DESIGNING A SOIL QUALITY ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR SUSTAINABLE AGROECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011%5B1573%3Adasqat%5D2.0.co%3B2